 |
|
ISS is continually sharpening our focus on developing our eGovernment - Criminal Justice Practice. Our research indicates that State and Local government entities are positioning themselves to leverage Internet based technologies, the maturing standards for integration and communications between agencies at Federal, State and Local levels, and the continuing reduction of technology costs available in the market today. The challenges facing State and Local governments significantly impact their ability to grow and maintain adequate revenue streams to fund vital projects.
Some of these challenges include: |
• |
Aging IT systems and infrastructure |
• |
Increased need to reference or exchange information from internal and external departments or agencies |
• |
Continued pressure to keep budgets low due to economic trends |
• |
Requirements to provide new services to the public |
| • |
Increasing or decreasing of population base’s effect on operating environments |
ISS’ innovative work in Service Oriented Architecture (SOA), intelligence-based business automation, and Web-based integration to legacy systems has served our clients well and has positioned us to be a partner for eGovernment projects over the last 15 years. Here are some of the highlights that make ISS a powerful eGovernment business partner: |
• |
Maturing use of iOpen™ Business Frameworks for rapid solution building |
| |
- |
Agile Business Integration Engine (ABie™) – Enterprise-Wide, SOA-Based, Distributed Services Platform and Enterprise Services Bus (ESB) |
| |
- |
Agile Business Infrastructure (ABin™) – A comprehensive suite of tools to monitor and manage hardware, software and network infrastructure |
| |
- |
Agile Business Engineering Studio (ABes™) – A comprehensive integration of software engineering technologies for rapid application development |
|
 |
| This product of the iJustice suite of products is designed specifically to help the following groups! Click on the group name to learn how. |
|
• |
iJCourt™ - a function rich, enterprise-wide, integrated court case management solution that serves as the hub for building integrated criminal justice networks for State and Local Government. At a high level, iJCourt™ includes the building blocks for expanding into integrated criminal justice: |
| |
- |
SOA-based enterprise integration platform |
| |
- |
Enterprise Services Bus (ESB) for implementing standards based integration to legacy systems, internal departments and organizations, LEA and other Federal, State and Local agencies |
|
|
Rules Based Engine to accommodate rapid changes in security, statues, laws, business rules, etc. within application systems |
|
|
Role based Security to manage authentication, authority and access down to the field level |
| • |
New iJustice™ solutions that can be tailored to client environments and integrated to iJCourt™ or other case management systems. |
| |
- |
iJProbation™ |
| |
- |
eCitation™ |
| |
- |
eComplaints™ |
| |
- |
eWarrants™ |
| |
- |
Automated Disposition Reporting (ADR) |
| • |
Integrated Criminal Justice eGovernment Strategy Planning Practice |
| • |
Integrated Criminal Justice Roadmap for Implementation |
The benefits of integrating justice agencies for the people involved are significant: |
• |
Improved public and officer safety as a result of having real time access to accurate and complete information to accomplish their jobs |
• |
Ability to perform their jobs in a much more efficient and effective manner |
• |
Timely notification of critical events as they happen |
• |
Positioning for future grant funding by being compliant with Global Justice XML Data Model (GJXDM) / National Information Exchange Model (NIEM) standards |
| • |
Ability to identify trends and patterns of crimes that will help law enforcement officers to decide how to allocate resources and plan better |
| • |
Realize substantial savings from productivity gains, such as eliminating duplicate data entry, from better decision making and avoidance of unnecessary lawsuits |
| • |
Positioning to absorb anticipated population growth by capitalizing on technology instead of further investments in clerical and other personnel |
|
|
|
